Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the TYPIC HAPLOXERALFS soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of TYPIC HAPLOXERALFS, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to TYPIC HAPLOXERALFS were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the TYPIC HAPLOXERALFS soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

There are insufficient data to create the water balance bar figure.



There are insufficient data to create the water balance line figure.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the TYPIC HAPLOXERALFS series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

There are insufficient data to create the sibling sketch figure.

Select annual climate data summaries for the TYPIC HAPLOXERALFS series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the TYPIC HAPLOXERALFS series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with TYPIC HAPLOXERALFS share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

There are insufficient data to create the competing sketch figure.

Select annual climate data summaries for the TYPIC HAPLOXERALFS series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the TYPIC HAPLOXERALFS series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with TYPIC HAPLOXERALFS, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

This figure is not available.

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. CA-2012-05-08-02 | Butte Area, Parts of Butte and Plumas Counties - 2006

    Block diagram 1.—This diagram shows the mouth of Big Chico Creek Canyon, where the creek transitions from its steeper foothill reach to its flatter Sacramento Valley reach in Bidwell Park. The creek has cut through the volcanic Tuscan Formation and is now cutting through hard Lovejoy basalt. The resistant Lovejoy basalt confines the stream channel, and a narrow slot canyon has formed at the bottom of the wider Tuscan Canyon. As the creek leaves the confinement of the slot canyon and enters the flatter topography of the valley, the energy of the water decreases, causing sediment to be deposited. As sediment fills the channel, the channel begins to move laterally. The channel slowly migrates away from the sediment deposits, allowing the sediment to form into alluvial soils (Soil Survey of Butte Area, California, Parts of Butte and Plumas Counties; 2006).

  2. CA-2012-05-08-06 | Butte Area, Parts of Butte and Plumas Counties - 2006

    Block diagram 5.—This diagram shows the relationships between the Cascade volcanic flows and the metamorphic and granitic Sierra Nevada rocks. The flatter volcanic flows on the left buried the folded metamorphic rocks in the middle. The uniform intrusive igneous rocks weather to soils that are less resistant to geologic erosion and produce subtle, more evenly developed relief (Soil Survey of Butte Area, California, Parts of Butte and Plumas Counties; 2006).

  3. CA-2012-05-08-07 | Butte Area, Parts of Butte and Plumas Counties - 2006

    Block diagram 6.—This diagram shows the transition from the volcanic foothills to the flatter topography of the strath terraces adjacent to the Sacramento Valley. In the steeper upper reaches, the stream channels are confined on the canyon bottoms and begin to migrate laterally as the gradient decreases. As the stream channels meander with lower energy, they deposit sediment, forming various alluvial soils and landforms over time (Soil Survey of Butte Area, California, Parts of Butte and Plumas Counties; 2006).

  4. CA-2012-05-08-09 | Butte Area, Parts of Butte and Plumas Counties - 2006

    Block diagram 8.—This diagram shows the stretch of Butte Creek Canyon where the creek has cut through volcanic flows, exposing underlying marine sedimentary rocks and Sierran metamorphic rocks. The upstream portion of the marine sedimentary rocks is conglomerate, the gravelly and cobbly facies. The downstream portion is sandstone, the sand facies. The conglomerate erodes one clast at a time and forms steep ravines. The sandstone holds water and often gives way in landslides and becomes buried by the colluvium from the rocks above (Soil Survey of Butte Area, California, Parts of Butte and Plumas Counties; 2006).

Map Units

Map units containing TYPIC HAPLOXERALFS as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Xerorthents, shallow-Typic Haploxeralfs-Rock outcrop, cliffs complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes62311972461453hh5lca61220051:24000
Xerorthents, shallow-Typic Haploxeralfs-Rock outrcrop, cliffs complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes62211197461454hh5mca61220051:24000
Jokerst-Doemill-Typic Haploxeralfs , 8 to 15 percent slopes6163935461265hgzjca61220051:24000
Typic Haploxeralfs, magnesic-Earlal-Cerpone-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes7043370461232hgygca61220051:24000
Xerorthents, shallow-Typic Haploxeralfs complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes6872226824118wnkgca61220051:24000
Typic Haploxeralfs, magnesic-Earlal-Cerpone-Rock outcrop complex, 50 to 80 percent slopes7051879461231hgyfca61220051:24000
Cerpone-Typic Haploxeralfs, magnesic-Earlal-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes.7031593461233hgyhca61220051:24000
Jokerst-Doemill-Typic Haploxeralfs , 15 to 30 percent slopes6171560461237hgymca61220051:24000
Cerpone-Typic Haploxeralfs, magnesic-Earlal complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes702247461234hgyjca61220051:24000
Typic Haploxeralfs, magnesic, low elevation-Earlal-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes684192461533hh85ca61220051:24000
Typic Haploxeralfs, magnesic, low elevation-Earlal-Rock outcrop complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes683102461534hh86ca61220051:24000
Xerorthents, shallow-Typic Haploxeralfs-Rock outcrop, cliffs complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes623bu3602766050hh5lca64519611:20000
Jokerst-Doemill-Typic Haploxeralfs , 15 to 30 percent slopes617bu2492766045hgymca64519611:20000
Xerorthents, shallow-Typic Haploxeralfs-Rock outrcrop, cliffs complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes622bu1762766051hh5mca64519611:20000
Jokerst-Doemill-Typic Haploxeralfs , 8 to 15 percent slopes616bu722766046hgzjca64519611:20000
Windage-Hawser-Typic Haploxeralfs complex 30 to 65 percent slopes711546514526211krkrca68820081:24000
Masthead-Coastwise-Typic Haploxeralfs complex, 45 to 75 percent slopes427385723934752lblwca68820081:24000
Buoy-Typic Haploxeralfs complex 9 to 30 percent slopes72582514526401krlcca68820081:24000
Typic Natrixeralfs-Typic Haploxeralfs, dry complex 5 to 20 percent slopes85027715970591qlw1ca68820081:24000
Rock outcrop-Typic Haploxeralfs complex, 50 to 120 percent slopes85320715970621qlw4ca68820081:24000
Typic Haploxeralfs, dry-Typic Natrixeralfs complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes85113715970601qlw2ca68820081:24000
Typic Haploxeralfs, fine-Haploxerolls, coarse-loamy, complex, 15 to 60 percent slopes9541020466589hnj8ca69120081:24000
Urban land-Typic Xerorthents, coarse substratum-Typic Haploxeralfs complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes1131502124417462myv0ca69620161:24000
Urban land-Typic Xerorthents, coarse substratum-Typic Haploxeralfs complex, 5 to 15 percent slopes113557224792912p6x4ca69620161:24000
Typic Haploxeralfs, 3 to 50 percent slopes62167465360hm7mca77619811:24000
Typic Xerorthents, warm-Typic Haploxeralfs-Badland complex, 30 to 100 percent slopesChFG17190471618htrhca77719811:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the TYPIC HAPLOXERALFS soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .